<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using the ENUM data type to increase performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fernandoipar.com/2009/03/09/using-the-enum-data-type-to-increase-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fernandoipar.com/2009/03/09/using-the-enum-data-type-to-increase-performance/</link>
	<description>I love mankind! Its people I can&#039;t stand!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://fernandoipar.com/2009/03/09/using-the-enum-data-type-to-increase-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fernandoipar.com/?p=119#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Fernando,

I wonder if you would get the same performance results if you exhaust the enum data type with up to 2^16-1 elements. I mean, what happens, if you have many different types, would it be better to pre-define all possible combinations in the scheme or would it be better to use a normalized scheme? Just from a performance point of view of course, elegance is somewhat different :D

But I think the difference would be negigible because you only shift the lookup problem.

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fernando,</p>
<p>I wonder if you would get the same performance results if you exhaust the enum data type with up to 2^16-1 elements. I mean, what happens, if you have many different types, would it be better to pre-define all possible combinations in the scheme or would it be better to use a normalized scheme? Just from a performance point of view of course, elegance is somewhat different <img src='http://fernandoipar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But I think the difference would be negigible because you only shift the lookup problem.</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://fernandoipar.com/2009/03/09/using-the-enum-data-type-to-increase-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fernandoipar.com/?p=119#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the message chris. 
I&#039;ve been neglecting the blog due to work lately, but I&#039;m sure coming back to it. 
I&#039;m standing by for OpenSQL Camp in Portland with my Percona team mates right now, that should give me some nice blogging material for my return :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the message chris.<br />
I&#8217;ve been neglecting the blog due to work lately, but I&#8217;m sure coming back to it.<br />
I&#8217;m standing by for OpenSQL Camp in Portland with my Percona team mates right now, that should give me some nice blogging material for my return <img src='http://fernandoipar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://fernandoipar.com/2009/03/09/using-the-enum-data-type-to-increase-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fernandoipar.com/?p=119#comment-110</guid>
		<description>i hope that u continue on posting more samples of programs... thnx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope that u continue on posting more samples of programs&#8230; thnx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

